quidditchgrrl: (Fuck Off)
[personal profile] quidditchgrrl
Those lovely douchebags in North Dakota. Here's what state senator Bill Napoli says about possible rape exceptions for the abortion ban:

A real-life description to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life.

(Meaning: unless you're a born-again virgin, you deserve to be raped, for once you've surrendered your maidenhead, it's a free-for-all)

Ah, but we do have a means of exacting a little revenge on Mr. Napoli (legally, I mean. I would really like to shoot this guy's...well, I'm sure you already have your plans a-brewin')

A suggestion from Smart Bitches, Trashy Books:

I’m thinking we should do to Napoli what Dan Savage did to Rick Santorum. The nifty thing is, Napoli himself has provided an excellent definition. I propose the following entry be entered into the lexicon:

napoli (not to be confused with the proper noun, which indicates the Italian city)
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): napolied
Pronunciation: nA’poli

1. To brutalize and rape, sodomize as bad as you can possibly make it, a young, religious virgin woman who was saving herself for marriage. 2. To hella rape somebody.

Etymology: From State Senator Bill Napoli’s (R-SD) words on an acceptable description of rape that would merit an exemption from South Dakota’s abortion ban.



Time for google-bombing: Bill Napoli

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-11 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bana05.livejournal.com
I'm not always correct, lol, though I do try to be fair.

Rape, there's definitely no choice--that's the very definition of the word. Incest . . . that's a bit trickier. There is such a thing as consensual incest, but we're not supposed to admit/talk about that. But either way, there's still a life involved. I know there are exception to murder such as self-defense, but that's usually against the perpetrator. This baby is anything but.

If the belief is birth begins at conception, the circumstances of said conception then become irrelevant to the allowance of an abortion, right?

I'm not saying, thus, it should be Pro-Choice, I'm just saying if you're going to be pro-Life, you have to be aware that you poke holes in the argument by making such allowances. If the pro-Life's main concern is the baby, then make it about the baby, not a moral statement about the mother, which that's what it seems like to me to be.

Profile

quidditchgrrl: (Default)
quidditchgrrl

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
1718 19 20 212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags