(no subject)
Apr. 13th, 2006 09:32 pmSo, does anyone know of a mapping tool to identify special collections and general collections?
I ask because I've made it through the first hoop and now hoop #2: "homework"
Hopefully I won't make an ass out of myself on this one...any of you library types out there? Advice?
I ask because I've made it through the first hoop and now hoop #2: "homework"
Hopefully I won't make an ass out of myself on this one...any of you library types out there? Advice?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-14 01:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-14 02:01 am (UTC)The question is: "Develop a mapping tool to identify special collections and general collections."
It seems like such a broad question! Any advice on serving special collections in the context of a larger library?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-14 02:10 am (UTC)We're lucky in that our collections are housed in closed stacks and do no circulate. We have reference (kept in the reading room) and are marked with a red barred rare book tag; secured area labelled books for books that aren't ours, but don't circulate for some reason or another; our general books have rare book tags; office books are labeled office on the rare book tag; and the ones that belong to the Cabell library are labeled as such.
The willy nilly nature of it drives me insane but it was done that way long before I arrived there and will continue on long after I leave (unless by some act of a god somewhere) I can drag them into the 21st century and force another system on them. I did force them to change how we label manuscript boxes with easier to read computer generated labels instead of type written ones. Yes, we still use a manual typewriter!
I think the color coding of the label is the easiest way. It's easy to learn and remember.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-14 02:28 am (UTC)I wonder if that's what they want to do?? It seems like such a waste to do that, but then again, might as well make the change now, eh?
Thanks for the advice!