quidditchgrrl (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
quidditchgrrl) wrote2006-10-27 10:04 pm
quidditchgrrl) wrote2006-10-27 10:04 pm
Entry tags:
Bah!
The biggest fluff piece masquerading as journalism in this town:
Jon Stewart: The Left's Answer to Bill O'Reilly
Yeah, me too. I'm thinking Dan Williamson is trying to pad his resume to get a better job with Fox News, or maybe The Dispatch.
The argument could be better made for Keith Olbermann, or even Stephen Colbert (how many pundits can get Wikipedia tied in knots, or instigate vote-running at a foreign website?). Jon doesn't go on many tirades (unless Bob Novak is making noise), and he certainly doesn't tell people to call/protest/boycott anything.
There isn't even insight in this article. It's just right for O'Reilly's ilk, a good header and very little substance.
Does anyone use The Daily Show as their only source for news? I don't know anyone who does. Maybe I'm just naive about that and there are millions of people who are laughing at most of the jokes without any knowledge of why they're funny. :-|
Jon Stewart: The Left's Answer to Bill O'Reilly
Yeah, me too. I'm thinking Dan Williamson is trying to pad his resume to get a better job with Fox News, or maybe The Dispatch.
The argument could be better made for Keith Olbermann, or even Stephen Colbert (how many pundits can get Wikipedia tied in knots, or instigate vote-running at a foreign website?). Jon doesn't go on many tirades (unless Bob Novak is making noise), and he certainly doesn't tell people to call/protest/boycott anything.
There isn't even insight in this article. It's just right for O'Reilly's ilk, a good header and very little substance.
Does anyone use The Daily Show as their only source for news? I don't know anyone who does. Maybe I'm just naive about that and there are millions of people who are laughing at most of the jokes without any knowledge of why they're funny. :-|